top of page
< Back
Category:

Save this article  > 

Decisions From the Ontario Courts - Oppression of Minority Owners

Author: 
Deborah Howden, Armand Conant
Publication date:
October 12, 2018
Article Summary: 

The article discusses three cases from the Ontario courts related to oppression of minority owners and other issues in condominium corporations. In the case of Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 396 v. Reino, the court found that the owner of a majority of units had oppressed the minority owners, resulting in personal liability for the oppressive conduct and termination of the condominium corporation. The Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 723 v. Reino case addressed the scope of binding status certificates and the corporation's responsibility to disclose information required by law. The Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporations Nos. 431 and 434 v. M. Atkins case dealt with a requisition to remove the board, prohibiting the use of proxies, and regulating communication with owners before a meeting.

Keywords: 

Ontario Courts, Oppression, Minority Owners, Condominium Corporations, Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 396, Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 723 v. Reino, Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporations Nos. 431 and 434 v. M. Atkins, Personal Liability, Binding Status Certificates, Requisition, Proxies, Communication, Democratic Governance, Condominium Act, 1998, Consumer Protection Legislation.



Source Citation: 
Deborah Howden, Armand Conant
Decisions From the Ontario Courts - Oppression of Minority Owners
October 12, 2018
Did you find this article useful? 
Your feedback is important not only to us, but to all the other key players in the condo industry.  Help us by letting us know if this article is relevant and useful.  This will help us prioritize articles that provide helpful guidance to other key players like you. 

Please login to use this feature.

bottom of page