top of page
< Back
Category:

Save this article  > 

Changes to the Collection Process Post Ching v. CCC 203: Recent Released Decision Directly Impacts Condo Lien Procedure & Costs

Author: 
Megan Molloy, Richard Elia
Publication date:
January 9, 2020
Article Summary: 

The case of Mei Ki Ching v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 203, 2019 ONSC 4338 ("Ching") has significant implications for the condo lien procedure and costs. The court ruled that a condo lien was invalid because the condo failed to provide proper notice to the non-titled spouse, despite her registered claim to the matrimonial home. The court's decision has frontloaded the costs involved in the common expense collection process, requiring an in-depth title search at an earlier stage than previously required under the Condominium Act, 1998.

Keywords: 

Mei Ki Ching v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 203, Ching, Condo Lien Procedure, Condo Lien Costs, Notice of Lien, Matrimonial Home, Family Law Act, Condominium Act 1998, Low-Cost Pre-Notice, Title Search, Common Expense Collection Process.




Source Citation: 
Megan Molloy, Richard Elia
Changes to the Collection Process Post Ching v. CCC 203: Recent Released Decision Directly Impacts Condo Lien Procedure & Costs
January 9, 2020
Did you find this article useful? 
Your feedback is important not only to us, but to all the other key players in the condo industry.  Help us by letting us know if this article is relevant and useful.  This will help us prioritize articles that provide helpful guidance to other key players like you. 

Please login to use this feature.

bottom of page