top of page
White Columns
< Back

York Condominium Corporation No. 20 v. Steen - 2023 ONCAT 176 - 2023-11-23


YCC 20


Thu Nov 23 2023 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)


In the case of York Condominium Corporation No. 20 v. Steen (2023 ONCAT 176), the Applicant, York Condominium Corporation No. 20, filed an application with the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT). The case progressed to Stage 3 – Tribunal Decision and transitioned to a mediation/adjudication process. On November 21, 2023, the Applicant expressed a desire to withdraw the case, with both parties confirming the resolution of the issues. In accordance with Rule 43.1 of the CAT's Rules of Practice, the Tribunal accepted the withdrawal and ordered the case closed.


CAT Decisions - Dismissal Order


The Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) issued a Withdrawal Order in the case of York Condominium Corporation No. 20 v. Steen, closing the case at Stage 3 – Tribunal Decision after the Applicant voluntarily withdrew their application. The order emphasizes the confidentiality of documents and messages exchanged during the case's various stages, allowing sharing only if required by law. The resolution underscores the effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution processes, such as mediation/adjudication, in achieving a mutually agreeable settlement between the parties.


Voluntary Withdrawal: The key takeaway is that the Applicant, York Condominium Corporation No. 20, voluntarily chose to withdraw their application from the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT). This decision signifies a resolution between the parties involved, as confirmed by their representatives.

Closure under Rule 43.1: The CAT, following Rule 43.1 of its Rules of Practice, closed the case at Stage 3 – Tribunal Decision due to the Applicant's withdrawal. This rule allows for the closure of a case if the Applicant expresses the intention to withdraw.

Confidentiality of Documents: The order emphasizes the private and confidential nature of documents and messages exchanged during the various stages of the case. Parties are restricted from sharing or disclosing such materials without the explicit permission of the other party, except when required by law.

Resolution through Mediation/Adjudication: The fact that the case proceeded to mediation/adjudication suggests an attempt by the parties to resolve their issues through an alternative dispute resolution process rather than a formal trial.

Legal Document Sharing Exceptions: While maintaining confidentiality, the order acknowledges exceptions, allowing parties to share case-related documents if required by law, such as for legal proceedings or government requirements.


Enhance Communication and Mediation Protocols: Encourage condominium corporations and their members to establish robust communication channels and explore mediation early in dispute resolution processes. This proactive approach can potentially prevent cases from escalating to formal tribunal proceedings, saving time and resources.

Education on CAT Rules and Procedures: Provide comprehensive education to parties involved in condominium disputes about the rules and procedures of the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT). This includes awareness of Rule 43.1, which allows for case closure upon the Applicant's withdrawal in Stage 3. Better understanding can lead to more informed decision-making and potentially streamline the resolution process.

Promote Confidentiality Guidelines: Emphasize the importance of maintaining confidentiality in the exchange of documents and messages during negotiation, mediation, and adjudication stages. While respecting privacy, parties should be educated on the exceptions, such as sharing documents if required by law. This can help prevent misunderstandings and ensure compliance with the CAT's confidentiality rules.

bottom of page