top of page
White Columns
< Back

Walsh v. London Condominium Corporation No. 39 - 2022 ONCAT 25 - 2022-03-23






In the case of Walsh v. London Condominium Corporation No. 39 (2022 ONCAT 25), the Applicant filed an application related to compliance with condominium governing documents regarding pets and the reasonableness of the corporation's rules. The Respondent, London Condominium Corporation No. 39, submitted a motion to dismiss the case on the grounds that the applicant was not a unit owner, and therefore lacked the standing to bring the application before the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT). The Applicant argued that she was in the process of having the unit's ownership transferred to her common-law partner's name. However, the CAT determined that, as occupants without current ownership status, they did not have the necessary standing under the Condominium Act. As a result, the case was dismissed in Stage 1 - Negotiation.


CAT Decisions - Dismissal Order


The applicant"s application was dismissed by the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) as she lacked standing to file a case since she was an occupant and not an owner of the unit in question, in accordance with the Condominium Act, 1998.

This case underscores the importance of understanding the legal requirements for standing when bringing a case before a tribunal or court. In this instance, the Applicant's common-law relationship and the potential transfer of ownership were insufficient to grant her standing to proceed with her application. It highlights the need to carefully assess one's legal standing before initiating legal actions.


Lack of Standing: The case of Walsh v. London Condominium Corporation No. 39 highlights the importance of standing in legal proceedings. In this instance, the Applicant did not have the necessary standing to file an application with the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) because she was an occupant and not an owner of the unit in question.

Condominium Act Provisions: The CAT's decision was based on Section 1.36 of the Condominium Act, 1998, which specifies that owners and condominium corporations are entitled to apply to the Tribunal for dispute resolution, while occupants or tenants do not have standing to bring cases.

Common-Law Relationship: The Applicant's argument that she should be allowed to continue the case due to her common-law relationship with the unit owner's relative was not sufficient to establish standing in this context.

Dismissal Order: The CAT granted the Respondent's motion to dismiss the application due to the lack of standing, resulting in a Dismissal Order.

Privacy and Confidentiality: During Stage 1 - Negotiation, any documents and messages shared between the parties were deemed private and confidential unless required to be shared by law with government organizations or courts.


Understand Legal Standing: It's crucial to comprehend the legal requirements for standing when pursuing a case before a tribunal or court. The case demonstrates the significance of recognizing who has the right to file a case and under what circumstances. Before initiating any legal actions, individuals should ensure they meet the legal standing criteria, as outlined in the relevant legislation or rules.

Consult Legal Professionals: When facing legal issues, especially in complex areas such as condominium disputes, it's advisable to seek legal counsel or representation. A legal professional can provide guidance on whether you have the standing to file a case and can help navigate the legal process effectively, potentially avoiding unnecessary dismissals like in this case.

Document Ownership Changes: If you are in the process of transferring ownership of a property, maintain clear and well-documented records of the transition. In cases where a change in ownership or occupancy is anticipated, having documented evidence can be critical to establishing standing or resolving potential disputes. Keep records of agreements, contracts, and legal proceedings related to the property transfer.

bottom of page