top of page
White Columns
< Back

Verjee v. York Condominium Corporation No. 43 - 2023 ONCAT 45 - 2023-03-21

Corporation:

VYCC 43

Date:

2023-03-21

Summary:

In Verjee v. York Condominium Corporation No. 43, the applicant sought access to various records from the condominium corporation. The respondent initially refused to provide some records and requested payment for others. The Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) conducted a written online hearing and reviewed the submissions. The CAT found that the respondent had no reasonable excuse for refusing to provide certain records and adjusted the amount the respondent requested for preparing other records. The CAT ordered the respondent to provide the requested records and pay a penalty of $275 to the applicant. Additionally, the respondent was directed to reimburse the applicant for the $125 case filing fee. The CAT emphasized the need for better cooperation and communication between the parties in order to avoid future disputes.

Under:

CAT Decisions - Decision
Access to Records
Adequacy of Records
Fees, Costs, Penalties

Verdict:

In the case of Verjee v. York Condominium Corporation No. 43, the tribunal ruled in favor of the condominium unit owner, ordering the corporation to provide requested records and pay a penalty of $275 for refusing to do so without reasonable excuse. The case highlights the importance of timely and accurate record provision in accordance with the Condominium Act, as well as the need for cooperation and effective communication between unit owners and condominium corporations to resolve disputes related to records. Additionally, the decision emphasizes that minor imperfections in records do not render them inadequate.




Takeaways:

In the case of Verjee v. York Condominium Corporation No. 43 (2023 ONCAT 45), the dispute centered around the provision of records to the condominium unit owner who had made several requests for specific documents. The respondent, York Condominium Corporation No. 43, initially refused to provide some records and requested a fee for others. The key takeaways from this case are as follows:

The case underscores the importance of timely and accurate record provision in accordance with the Condominium Act, 1998. Unit owners are entitled to access certain records from their condominium corporation.

The tribunal acknowledged that the respondent's refusal to provide records was due to inadvertent errors, but reasonable excuses must be considered to avoid penalties.

The tribunal exercised its discretion to award a penalty of $275 due to the refusal to provide records and ordered the respondent to cover the applicant's costs of $125, highlighting that costs may be awarded in such cases.

The case emphasizes the need for effective communication and cooperation between unit owners and condominium corporations to resolve disputes and issues related to records provision.




Recommendations: 

Enhance Communication and Cooperation: In condominium disputes, open and constructive communication is crucial. Both condominium corporations and unit owners should aim to work together in resolving issues and fulfilling requests for records. Establishing a more cooperative and transparent relationship can help prevent disputes from escalating to the legal level.

Understanding and Adhering to Condominium Rules: Both condominium corporations and unit owners should make an effort to fully understand the condominium rules and regulations, including those regarding record requests. This understanding can help prevent unnecessary disputes and ensure that requests for records are made and fulfilled in accordance with the law.

Appropriate Record Keeping and Management: Condominium corporations should maintain proper and organized records to facilitate efficient responses to unit owner requests. This includes keeping accurate and up-to-date records, having clear procedures for record requests, and ensuring that staff are aware of their responsibilities in handling such requests. Adequate record keeping can help avoid disputes over the completeness and accuracy of records provided to unit owners.

bottom of page