Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Choose your role:
Tonu Orav v York Condominium Corporation No. 344 - 2019 ONCAT 18 - 2019-06-11
Corporation:
TOYCC 344
Date:
2019-06-11
Summary:
The case of Tonu Orav v York Condominium Corporation No. 344 involved a dispute over access to records under section 55 of the Condominium Act 1998. The applicant, Tonu Orav, requested various records from the respondent, York Condominium Corporation No. 344, and claimed that the responses provided were inadequate. The respondent did not participate in the hearing beyond the initial stages. The tribunal found in favor of the applicant, ordering the respondent to provide the requested records. A penalty of $2,000 was imposed on the respondent for failing to adequately address the records requests, and the applicant was awarded $200 in filing fees. The case highlighted the importance of complying with records requests and the consequences of failure to do so.
Under:
CAT Decisions - Decision
Access to Records
Entitlement to Records
Fees, Costs, Penalties
Verdict:
the quick verdict/lesson from the case of Tonu Orav v York Condominium Corporation No. 344 is that the applicant was entitled to the requested records under section 55 of the Condominium Act 1998. The respondent's failure to adequately address the records requests led to a penalty of $2,000 being imposed against them. This case emphasizes the importance of complying with records requests and the consequences of not doing so in condominium corporation disputes.
Takeaways:
Non-participation consequences: The respondent, York Condominium Corporation No. 344, did not participate beyond the initial stages of the hearing. Their lack of participation led to a penalty of $2,000 being imposed against them. This highlights the importance of active participation in legal proceedings to ensure a fair and just outcome.
Entitlement to records: The applicant, Tonu Orav, requested various records under the Condominium Act 1998. The tribunal found that the applicant was entitled to the requested records, which included core records such as financial statements, meeting minutes, and other relevant documents. This emphasizes the importance of access to these records for transparency and accountability within condominium corporations.
Penalty for failure to provide records: The respondent was ordered to pay a penalty of $2,000 for failing to adequately address the applicant's request for records. This decision emphasizes the consequences of not fulfilling obligations under the Condominium Act and the importance of timely and complete responses to records requests.
Recommendations:
Ensure timely and complete fulfillment of records requests: Condominium corporations should prioritize responding to records requests within a reasonable time period and ensure that all requested records are provided to the requester. Failure to do so may result in penalties or legal disputes, as seen in the Tonu Orav v York Condominium Corporation No. 344 case.
Encourage active participation from all parties involved: It is essential for all parties involved in a dispute to actively participate in legal proceedings and meet the set deadlines. Non-participation may result in penalties and can also lead to an unfair outcome. Condo boards and managers should work to ensure that all parties have the opportunity and means to participate.
Seek guidance and clarification on jurisdictional limits: It is important to understand the jurisdictional limits of the Condominium Authority Tribunal. Requesting items or relief that fall outside of their scope may lead to additional legal disputes and unnecessary complications. Seek guidance and clarification when unsure to avoid potential disputes and ensure compliance with regulations.