top of page
White Columns
< Back

Stoyanov v. York Condominium Corporation No. 141 et al. - 2024 ONCAT 32 - 2024-03-06


SYCC 141


Wed Mar 06 2024 05:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)


In Stoyanov v. York Condominium Corporation No. 141 et al., the applicant alleged nuisance from cigarette smoke and odor migrating into his unit from a neighboring unit. However, the tribunal found no evidence supporting the claim, dismissing the application without costs. The tribunal concluded that the respondent fulfilled its obligations under the Condominium Act by investigating complaints but found no confirmation of smoke or odor. It declined to make orders against the applicant or his mother for alleged harassment of the neighbor. The tribunal urged cooperation with the condominium's directives and reminded of shared responsibilities.


CAT Decisions - Decision
Smoke and/or vapour


In condominium disputes, evidence plays a critical role in establishing claims. Mere assertions without substantiation may not hold weight in legal proceedings. Furthermore, understanding the jurisdictional limits of the tribunal or court is essential to avoid pursuing remedies beyond its scope.


Clear evidence is crucial in establishing claims of nuisance or harassment.
Compliance with condominium regulations and cooperation with investigations is essential for dispute resolution.
Effective communication and cooperation among residents can prevent escalations in condominium disputes.


Ensure thorough documentation and evidence collection before pursuing legal action in condominium disputes.
Encourage open communication and cooperation between parties to address grievances promptly.
Seek clarification on condominium rules and regulations to understand rights and responsibilities fully.

bottom of page