top of page
White Columns
< Back

S. v. Merdiu et al. - 2023 ONCAT 101 - 2023-07-26


SM 101




In this motion order, the Applicant requested that their and their Agent's identifying information be subject to a confidentiality order to protect their privacy and safety. The Intervenor did not contest this request but suggested that the final order not be sealed for the sake of jurisprudence. The decision was made based on the sensitivity of the information, with the Tribunal noting the potential harm to the dignity of the individuals involved if their information were made public. The motion was granted, and all exhibits, documents, and message threads in the adjudicative record were made confidential. Additionally, all decisions in the case would anonymize the names and identifying information of the Applicant and their Agent.


CAT Decisions - Motion Order


Quick Verdict/Lesson: In this motion order, the Tribunal granted a confidentiality order to protect the sensitive personal information of the Applicant and their Agent, based on concerns for safety and mental health. The order restricts public access to all case-related materials, anonymizes the names and identifying information of the Applicant and their Agent in any decisions, and emphasizes the importance of preserving the privacy and confidentiality of individuals involved in tribunal cases. This case underscores the significance of safeguarding sensitive personal data and respecting the dignity and safety of parties involved in legal proceedings.


Takeaways from S. v. Merdiu et al., 2023 ONCAT 101:

Confidentiality Order: The Tribunal granted a motion for a confidentiality order to protect sensitive personal information. The Applicant and their Agent expressed concerns for their safety and mental health if their information became public.

Balance of Interests: The Intervenor, while not objecting to the confidentiality request, emphasized the importance of transparency and the open court principle, stating that any decision by the Tribunal contributes to jurisprudence.

Protection of Dignity: The decision referenced Sherman Estate v. Donovan, emphasizing that the release of highly sensitive personal information, even if not inherently "personal," can be a violation of an individual's dignity, necessitating an exception to the open court principle.

Confidentiality Measures: All materials related to the case were deemed confidential, and the identities of the Applicant and their Agent were anonymized in any decisions to ensure their privacy and confidentiality.

Strict Confidentiality: The order emphasized strict confidentiality, with only specific individuals, such as Tribunal members and staff, having access to the confidential record, and all parties were ordered not to disclose or share details of the adjudicative record or identities of the Applicant and their Agent.


Standardize Confidentiality Procedures: The Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) should establish standardized procedures and guidelines for handling confidentiality requests. This includes defining the criteria for granting such requests, the process for anonymizing personal information, and the steps to ensure that confidential information remains protected throughout the proceedings.

Balancing Transparency and Privacy: CAT should maintain a balance between transparency and privacy. While it is important to protect individuals' sensitive information, there should be careful consideration of the public's right to access information and legal decisions. CAT could explore mechanisms such as redaction or sealed documents to strike this balance effectively.

Security Measures: CAT should implement robust security measures to safeguard confidential information in its records. This includes secure storage, controlled access, and monitoring to prevent unauthorized disclosure. Parties and their representatives should also be educated on their responsibilities in preserving confidentiality.

bottom of page