top of page
White Columns
< Back

Rahman v. Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 779 - 2023 ONCAT 9 - 2023-01-25






In the case of Rahman v. Peel Condominium Corporation No. 779, a motion was brought by the applicant to disqualify who represented the Respondent, Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 779 (PSCC 779), in a dispute involving parking signage. The applicant alleged a conflict of interest and civil fraud on the Elia Associates lawyer's part. The tribunal found that the applicant had not provided clear evidence to support the disqualification of counsel. The motion was dismissed.


CAT Decisions - Motion Order


Verdict: The motion to disqualify counsel in the case of Rahman v. Peel Condominium Corporation No. 779 has been dismissed. The Applicant failed to establish that the counsel, should be disqualified.



The applicant sought to disqualify the lawyer as counsel in a condominium dispute but failed to provide clear evidence to support his claims.

The tribunal found that the conflict of interest allegations were not substantiated and that Yee's representation did not warrant disqualification.

The jurisdiction of the Condominium Authority Tribunal includes the power to control its processes to prevent abuse of process, which may involve disqualifying counsel if necessary.

The motion was seen as tactical, potentially aimed at delaying the proceedings, but was not considered an abuse of process due to Rahman's self-represented status.

Parties have the right to choose their counsel, and disqualification should only occur in clear cases of conflict of interest or the need for counsel as a witness.



Parties should carefully consider the evidence and legal basis before attempting to disqualify counsel.
Disqualifying counsel should be pursued only in cases of clear conflict of interest, where counsel may become a witness, or in other exceptional circumstances.
Self-represented individuals should be aware of the legal requirements and potential consequences when bringing motions or making allegations in legal proceedings.

bottom of page