top of page
White Columns
< Back

Lorenzon v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2181 - 2023 ONCAT 109 - 2023-08-09


LTSCC 2181




In the case of Lorenzon v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2181, a Consent Order was issued by the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT). The Applicant had brought a case to the CAT regarding what she considered unreasonable noise coming from the elevators in the Respondent's condominium. The Applicant claimed that this elevator noise constituted a nuisance, annoyance, or disruption, contrary to the Condominium Act, 1998, and the rules and regulations of the Respondent. The case had advanced to Stage 3 - Tribunal Decision, but with the consent of both parties, the CAT issued this Consent Order to close the case. This Consent Order signifies the resolution of the dispute, and no findings on the merits or orders regarding costs were made by the CAT.


CAT Decisions - Consent Order


Quick Verdict: In Lorenzon v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2181 (2023 ONCAT 109), the case was brought to the Tribunal due to elevator noise disputes within a condominium. Both the Applicant and the Respondent reached a Consent Order, leading to the case's closure without any formal decision or costs ordered. The Consent Order is a practical resolution method in the Tribunal process, allowing parties to reach an agreement and end the case efficiently, but it doesn't affect their rights for further action outside of the Tribunal. Compliance with the order is enforceable through the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.


Key Takeaways from Lorenzon v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2181 (2023 ONCAT 109):

Noise Dispute Resolution: The case involved an Applicant's complaint about unreasonable noise from elevators in a condominium. The dispute was based on the alleged nuisance, annoyance, or disturbance caused by elevator noise, which is a common issue in condominium living.

Consent Order: In this case, the Applicant and Respondent reached an agreement through a Consent Order to resolve the dispute. A Consent Order can be a practical way to close a case without the need for a formal Tribunal decision, provided both parties are in agreement.

Case Closure: The Consent Order resulted in the closure of the case. This can be useful in expediting the resolution of condominium disputes, especially when both parties are satisfied with the terms of the agreement.

Without Prejudice: The case was dismissed on a "without prejudice" basis, meaning that it does not affect the legal rights of either party to pursue any further legal action or costs outside of the Tribunal, if needed.

Enforcement Mechanism: The order specifies that if any party fails to comply with the terms of the order, it can be enforced through the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, emphasizing the legal enforceability of such orders.


Educational Initiatives: The Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) should consider implementing educational initiatives or resources aimed at helping condominium owners and corporations understand the jurisdiction of the CAT. This could include clear guidelines and information about what types of disputes fall within the CAT's purview and what falls outside it. Ensuring that parties are aware of the jurisdictional boundaries can prevent unnecessary filings and help conserve time and resources.

Alternative Dispute Resolution: Encourage alternative dispute resolution methods, such as mediation or negotiation, before cases progress to the Tribunal's later stages. This can help parties find common ground and resolve issues without going through a full Tribunal hearing. Promoting alternative dispute resolution can be a cost-effective and efficient way to address condominium-related disputes and reduce the workload of the Tribunal.

Enhance Procedural Clarity: The CAT should continue to enhance the clarity of its procedures and processes, particularly those related to case progression and consent orders. Making the steps and implications of each stage more transparent for parties involved in a dispute can lead to better-informed decisions. It can also reduce the risk of disputes being brought to the Tribunal that fall outside its jurisdiction, as parties will have a clearer understanding of when the Tribunal is the appropriate venue for their case.

bottom of page