top of page
White Columns
< Back

D'Souza v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2565 et al. - 2024 ONCAT 23 - 2024-02-15


DTSCC 2565


Thu Feb 15 2024 05:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)


In the case of D'Souza v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2565 et al., the applicant, alleged that cigarette smoke and odor from neighboring units were causing a nuisance in her condominium. Despite her assertions, the tribunal found insufficient evidence to support her claims. The tribunal concluded that the respondent had not failed to enforce compliance with its smoking rules and dismissed the application without costs.


CAT Decisions - Decision
Compliance with Governing Documents
Smoke and/or vapour


Accusations of nuisance require robust evidence and adherence to legal procedures. Without substantial proof, claims may not be upheld, emphasizing the importance of thorough documentation and cooperation in resolving disputes.


Thorough investigation and evidence are crucial in resolving disputes involving nuisances like smoke and odor in condominiums.
Assertions must be supported by objective evidence to establish claims of nuisance under the law.
The tribunal considers factors such as severity, frequency, and reasonableness of interference when assessing nuisance claims.
Disputes regarding nuisances in condominiums may involve complex interpretations of governing documents and regulations.


Encourage proactive communication and cooperation between residents and condominium management to address concerns before they escalate.
Implement clear protocols and procedures for investigating and resolving complaints related to nuisances.
Provide education and awareness programs for residents regarding smoking regulations and the impact of their behavior on neighbors' enjoyment of their units.

bottom of page