top of page
White Columns
< Back


Middlesex Standard Condominium Corporation No. 764 v. Segun-Idahor et al. - 2023 ONCAT 135 - 2023-09-22

Corporation:

MSCC 764

Date:

2023-09-22

Summary:

In the case of Middlesex Standard Condominium Corporation No. 764 v. Segun-Idahor et al. (2023 ONCAT 135), the Applicant, a condominium corporation, filed a case against a unit owner and a tenant who had entered into a Settlement Agreement. The Applicant alleged that the Respondents had breached the terms of the Settlement Agreement related to parking in designated areas. The Tribunal found that the Respondents did breach the Settlement Agreement and ordered them to comply with its terms. Additionally, the Tribunal ordered the Respondents to pay $2,537.50 in legal costs incurred by the Applicant and $1,602.32 for costs related to this application, along with $125 in respect of the Tribunal fees. The order specified that both the tenant and owner were jointly and severally liable for these costs.

Under:

CAT Decisions - Decision
Compliance with Settlement Agreement
Parking and Storage
Vehicles

Verdict:

The case highlights the importance of adhering to Settlement Agreements in condominium disputes. It also underscores the potential financial consequences for breaching such agreements, as the Respondents were held liable for legal costs incurred by the Applicant in addition to being ordered to comply with the original terms. The decision reinforces the principle that parties should act in good faith and follow the terms of legally binding agreements to avoid legal repercussions.

Takeaways:

Here are some key takeaways from the case "Middlesex Standard Condominium Corporation No. 764 v. Segun-Idahor et al., 2023 ONCAT 135":

Settlement Agreement Breach: The case revolves around a breach of a Settlement Agreement between the Middlesex Standard Condominium Corporation No. 764 (MSCC 764) and the unit owner, and the tenant. The Settlement Agreement contained specific terms related to parking and vehicle-related rules.

Compliance Allegations: The Applicant, MSCC 764, alleged that the Respondents (the unit owner and tenant) breached specific clauses of the Settlement Agreement, particularly related to parking in visitor-designated spaces and designated fire routes on the condominium premises.

Timeline of Alleged Breaches: The Applicant provided evidence of several instances where they claimed the Respondents or their visitors violated the Settlement Agreement: April 27, May 31, June 9, June 13, and June 16, 2023.

Evidence and Findings: The decision examines the evidence presented by both parties and ultimately finds that the Respondents did breach the Settlement Agreement on multiple occasions. The breaches related to parking in violation of the agreed-upon terms.

Orders: The Tribunal issues several orders in response to the breaches, including:

An order for the Respondents to comply with the Settlement Agreement's terms, specifically related to parking rules.
An order for the Respondents to pay $2,537.50 in legal costs incurred by the Applicant from October 12, 2022, through December 7, 2022. Both the Respondent Tenant and Owner are jointly and severally liable for this payment.
An order for the Respondents to pay $1,602.32 in costs incurred by the Applicant for this application, and an additional $125 in respect of the Tribunal fees paid by the Applicant. Again, both the Respondent Tenant and Owner are jointly and severally liable for these costs.
These orders aim to remedy the contravention of the Settlement Agreement and address the legal costs incurred by the Applicant in pursuing this matter.

Recommendations: 

Communication and Awareness of Settlement Agreements: Condominium corporations and unit owners should emphasize clear and effective communication regarding the terms of any settlement agreements. It is crucial for all parties to fully understand their obligations under such agreements, including parking and compliance with condominium rules. Encouraging transparency in these agreements can help prevent future disputes.

Timely Compliance and Dispute Resolution: Once a settlement agreement is in place, it is essential for all parties to adhere to the terms promptly. In the event of a breach, condominium corporations should initiate dispute resolution processes promptly to address the issue. This proactive approach can help maintain a harmonious living environment within the condominium community.

Cost Transparency and Fair Allocation: In cases where legal costs are sought by the condominium corporation due to a breach of a settlement agreement, it is advisable for both parties to have a clear understanding of the potential financial consequences of non-compliance. Promote transparency in legal cost estimates and ensure that the allocation of these costs is in line with the specific terms of the agreement. Clear communication about potential financial penalties can encourage compliance and avoid disputes.

bottom of page