Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Choose your role:
Waterloo North Condominium Corporation No. 37 v. Baha et al
Corporation:
Date:
2024-08-26
Summary:
This case involves a dispute between a condominium unit owner and the condominium corporation regarding noise disturbance due to construction activities. The Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) ruled that it did not have jurisdiction over the matter as it falls under the noise bylaws and not condominium regulations.
Under:
Noise, Dispute Resolution, CAT Jurisdiction
Verdict:
The CAT dismissed the application due to lack of jurisdiction over noise complaints related to construction activities. This case underscores the importance of understanding the jurisdiction of the CAT and the need to address such disputes through the appropriate channels.
Takeaways:
- The CAT has limited jurisdiction and does not cover all disputes between condominium owners and condominium corporations.
- Noise disputes due to construction activities fall under the jurisdiction of municipal noise bylaws rather than condominium regulations.
- The CAT encourages parties to resolve disputes through alternate methods such as mediation, negotiation, or arbitration.
Recommendations:
- Condominium corporations should provide clear guidelines regarding noise disturbances and direct owners to the appropriate channels for addressing different types of disputes.
- Condominium boards or managers should consider alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation, negotiation, or arbitration for issues outside the CAT's jurisdiction.
- Boards should ensure they are familiar with the CAT's jurisdiction and ensure they handle disputes accordingly.