top of page
White Columns
< Back

Rangan v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 996 - 2023 ONCAT 11 - 2023-01-25

Corporation:

RMTCC 996

Date:

2023-01-25

Under:

CAT Decisions - Decision
Fees, Costs, Penalties

Summary:

In the case of Rangan v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 996 (2023 ONCAT 11), the applicant sought records from the respondent, Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 996 (MTCC 966). The records were provided after the applicant filed an application with the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT). The applicant requested reimbursement for the cost of filing the application and their estimated proportionate share of legal fees. The parties resolved most issues in negotiation, but the applicant insisted on reimbursement for the legal fees. The tribunal ordered MTCC 966 to pay the $25 filing fee but denied the applicant's additional cost requests. MTCC 966's request for reimbursement of legal fees was also denied.

Verdict:

Verdict/Lesson:
The tribunal ordered the respondent to reimburse the applicant $25 for the cost of filing the application, as the respondent had failed to provide the required Board Response Forms promptly. However, the applicant's request for additional reimbursements related to moving the case to mediation and legal fees share was denied, as these demands were considered unreasonable due to their nominal amounts. Furthermore, the respondent's request for the applicant to reimburse their legal fees was also denied, as it was deemed disproportionate to the issues at hand. This case underscores the importance of timely compliance with legal requirements to avoid unnecessary disputes and costs.

Takeaways:

Takeaways:

The case involved a dispute over records request under the Condominium Act, 1998.

The applicant was awarded the reimbursement of the $25 filing fee as MTCC 966 failed to provide records promptly.

The tribunal denied the applicant's additional cost requests for moving the case to mediation and legal fees share.

MTCC 966's request for reimbursement of their legal fees was also rejected.

The case highlights the importance of prompt provision of records in accordance with legal requirements to avoid unnecessary disputes and costs.

Recommendations: 

Recommendations:

Ensure timely provision of requested documents to avoid potential disputes and legal costs.
Parties involved in disputes should consider the reasonableness of their cost requests, especially in relation to the overall dispute's magnitude.
Cooperation and reasonable communication during dispute resolution processes can have a positive impact on outcomes.

bottom of page