top of page
White Columns
< Back

Rahman v. Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 779 - 2023 ONCAT 37 - 2023-03-10

Corporation:

RPSCC 779

Date:

2023-03-10

Under:

CAT Decisions - Dismissal Order
Odour
Smoke and/or vapour

Summary:

The case of Rahman v. Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 779 was dismissed by the Condominium Authority Tribunal. The dispute centered around odours, vapours, smells, smoke, and other airborne contaminants entering the applicant's unit through faulty vent covers. Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 779 argued that this was a maintenance and repair issue, outside the jurisdiction of the tribunal. Despite acrimony between the parties and other ongoing legal proceedings, the tribunal determined that the case was indeed a maintenance and repair issue and dismissed it.

Verdict:

In the case of Rahman v. Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 779 (2023 ONCAT 37), the applicant filed a complaint regarding odors, vapors, and smoke entering his unit due to faulty vent covers. However, the Tribunal issued a dismissal order, ruling that the case was primarily about maintenance and repair issues rather than a nuisance, annoyance, or disruption, which falls outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction. The decision underscores the importance of understanding the specific nature of a dispute and whether it falls within the legal jurisdiction of the adjudicating body before proceeding with a case.

Takeaways:

Takeaways from the case of Rahman v. Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 779 (2023 ONCAT 37):

The case involved a dispute between the applicant and Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 779 (PSCC 779) concerning odors, vapors, smells, and smoke entering the applicant's unit due to faulty vent covers.

PSCC 779 filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that it was a matter of maintenance and repair rather than a nuisance, annoyance, or disruption, which is within the jurisdiction of the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT).

The CAT has the authority to deal with cases involving nuisances, annoyances, or disruptions under certain conditions as defined in the Condominium Act, 1998.

The Tribunal found that the substance of the case was related to maintenance and repair issues rather than a nuisance or disruption and, therefore, fell outside the CAT's jurisdiction.

The case was dismissed under Rule 19.1(c) of the Tribunal's Rules of Practice, as it did not have the legal power to hear or decide this particular case.

Recommendations: 

Review Governing Documents: It's important for condominium owners to thoroughly review the governing documents of their condominium corporation. These documents include the declaration, by-laws, and rules and regulations. Understanding these documents can help owners know their rights and responsibilities, as well as the rules and restrictions in place.

Understand Condominium Act: Condominium owners should also familiarize themselves with the Condominium Act, 1998, or the relevant legislation in their jurisdiction. This act sets out the legal framework for condominium living, including rules related to common elements, disputes, and governance.

Consider Mediation: In cases of disputes with the condominium corporation or other owners, consider mediation as an initial step. Mediation can help parties resolve conflicts more amicably and cost-effectively than going to a tribunal or court.

Consult Legal Counsel: If a dispute cannot be resolved through mediation or direct negotiation, consider seeking legal counsel. A lawyer experienced in condominium law can provide advice and guidance on how to proceed with a dispute and whether it's appropriate to escalate it to a condominium authority tribunal or a court.

bottom of page