top of page
White Columns
< Back

Kai Sin Yeung v Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1136 - 2019 ONCAT 29 - 2019-08-12

Corporation:

KSYMTCC 1136

Date:

2019-08-12

Summary:

In the case of Kai Sin Yeung v Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1136, a Consent Order was issued on August 12, 2019. The dispute involved tribunal fees, and the Applicant and the Respondent, Metro Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1136, reached an agreement to settle the case. As a result of this Consent Order, the following terms were agreed upon: Metro Toronto Condominium Corporation Number 1136 would reimburse the applicant $75.00 for tribunal fees within 30 days. If either party failed to comply with the terms of the order, it could be enforced by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

Under:

CAT Decisions - Consent Order
Fees, Costs, Penalties

Verdict:

In the case of Kai Sin Yeung v Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1136, a Consent Order was issued to resolve the dispute, highlighting the effectiveness of the Tribunal in facilitating amicable agreements between parties without the need for a formal hearing. The Order mandated that the Respondent, Metro Toronto Condominium Corporation Number 1136, reimburse the Applicant $75.00 for tribunal fees, reinforcing the importance of fulfilling agreed-upon terms in dispute resolutions. The lesson here is that the Condominium Authority Tribunal can efficiently assist in settling condominium-related disputes through mutually accepted agreements, ensuring compliance through legal enforcement.




Takeaways:

Resolution Through Consent: The Applicant and the Respondent agreed to settle their dispute, leading to the issuance of a Consent Order, demonstrating the willingness of both parties to reach an agreement without a formal hearing.

Reimbursement of Tribunal Fees: As part of the agreement, Metro Toronto Condominium Corporation Number 1136 committed to reimbursing the Applicant $75.00 for tribunal fees, showing a resolution of financial matters.

Legal Enforcement: The Consent Order highlights that any failure to comply with its terms can be enforced through the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, emphasizing the legal binding nature of such agreements.

Efficient Dispute Resolution: The case illustrates the Tribunal's role in facilitating efficient and mutually agreeable solutions to condominium-related disputes, reducing the burden of lengthy legal proceedings.

Compliance Assurance: The Consent Order acts as a mechanism to ensure that both parties adhere to the agreed terms, fostering accountability in dispute resolution.

Recommendations: 

Alternative Dispute Resolution: Encourage parties involved in condominium disputes to consider alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation or negotiation. These methods can help expedite dispute resolution without the need for a formal hearing.

Timely Compliance: Ensure that all parties involved in Consent Orders or agreements comply with the agreed-upon terms within the specified timeframes. Timely compliance helps maintain trust and accountability in dispute resolutions.

Clear Enforcement Mechanisms: Make sure that Consent Orders or agreements include clear enforcement mechanisms in case of non-compliance. This provides a legal avenue to ensure that agreed-upon terms are upheld.

bottom of page