top of page
White Columns
< Back

Gingras v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2423 - 2023 ONCAT 108 - 2023-08-09


GTSCC 2423




In the case of Gingras v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2423, a Motion Order was issued by the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT). The Applicant had filed a Request for Records with the Respondent on December 30, 2022, and a subsequent request for the same records on June 7, 2023, to update their currency. The issues to be addressed in this case included whether the Respondent provided the requested records, whether they refused to provide them without a reasonable excuse, and if the CAT should impose a penalty or award any other costs. The Respondent expressed a preference for written submissions, but only the Applicant made submissions. As the requested records were the same types of records in both requests, the CAT granted the motion to include the records requested on June 7, 2023, within the issues of this case for efficiency.


CAT Decisions - Motion Order


Quick Verdict:

In the case of Gingras v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2423 (2023 ONCAT 108), the Tribunal addressed the consolidation of records requests. The Applicant had made two separate requests to the Respondent for core records. The Tribunal allowed the inclusion of the records requested on June 7, 2023, within the existing case, as they pertained to the same type of records sought, aiming for a more efficient process. This decision highlights the importance of streamlining proceedings and efficiently addressing related records requests in condominium disputes, especially when there are no submissions from the Respondent to the contrary.

Efficiency in case management and consolidation of related records requests can simplify proceedings and help ensure timely resolution of condominium disputes, particularly when there are no objections or submissions from the involved parties.


Key Takeaways from Gingras v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2423 (2023 ONCAT 108):

Dual Records Requests: In this case, the Applicant made two separate records requests to the Respondent: one on December 30, 2022, and another on June 7, 2023. The Applicant sought to include the records from the June 7th request within the existing case, which focused on the December 30th request. This consolidation streamlines the process for addressing both sets of records.

Efficient Case Management: The Tribunal emphasizes the importance of efficiency in handling cases. When the Respondent did not provide written submissions regarding the additional records request, the Tribunal decided to include both requests in the existing case, avoiding unnecessary duplication and proceedings.

Clarity of Issues: This decision underscores the significance of clarifying the issues at hand in condominium-related disputes. In this instance, the issues revolved around whether the Respondent provided the requested records and whether they had a reasonable excuse for not doing so, potentially resulting in a penalty.

Written Submissions: The Respondent's preference for written submissions was respected, highlighting the flexibility and adaptability of the Tribunal's procedures to accommodate parties' preferences.

Procedural Streamlining: Combining related requests into a single case helps streamline proceedings, ensuring that issues are addressed efficiently and without unnecessary delay.


Clear Communication with Respondents: The Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) should emphasize the importance of active participation by respondents. Implement a communication strategy to ensure that respondents are aware of their obligation to submit responses or attend hearings. This may include reminders and notifications sent to respondents, encouraging them to provide their submissions within specified timelines. Clear communication helps maintain procedural fairness and efficient case resolution.

Efficient Case Management: Streamline the case management process by allowing related requests or updates, such as the June 7th request for more current records in this case, to be included within the existing case. This approach can help avoid unnecessary duplication of proceedings and promote efficiency in addressing the applicant's concerns. The CAT should have clear procedures in place for handling such updates within ongoing cases.

Procedural Fairness and Consistency: Ensure that both applicants and respondents are treated fairly and consistently in all cases. This includes providing clear guidelines on how records requests and updates should be addressed and communicated within the CAT's rules and procedures. Applicants and respondents should have a shared understanding of the process and their respective responsibilities, promoting fairness and consistency across all cases.

bottom of page