Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Choose your role:
Callaghan v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1465 - 2024 ONCAT 42 - 2024-03-18
Corporation:
CTSCC 1465
Date:
Mon Mar 18 2024 04:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
Under:
CAT Decisions - Decision
Compliance with Settlement Agreement
Summary:
In the case of Callaghan v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1465, A unit owner, alleged that the condominium corporation breached a Settlement Agreement reached in a previous dispute. The Settlement Agreement involved the provision of information certificates, revisions to certain sections, and answering specific financial questions, among other terms. The Respondent partially breached the Settlement Agreement by not meeting deadlines for revisions and providing written answers. However, the breach was addressed before the case was filed, and the breaches were deemed inconsequential. An award of costs was not deemed appropriate due to excessive submissions by the Applicant and the minor nature of the breach.
Verdict:
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay $200 to the Applicant, consistent with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. However, an award of costs was not granted due to the minor nature of the breach and the excessive submissions made by the Applicant.
Takeaways:
Settlement Agreements in condominium disputes outline specific terms and obligations agreed upon by the parties.
Failure to meet deadlines or fulfill obligations outlined in a Settlement Agreement may constitute a breach.
The significance of a breach and the parties' efforts to address it may influence the Tribunal's decision regarding an award of costs.
Excessive submissions and disagreements over the interpretation of settlement terms can complicate dispute resolution.
The Tribunal has discretionary power to order remedies for breaches of Settlement Agreements.
Recommendations:
Parties involved in Settlement Agreements should ensure clear and detailed terms to minimize ambiguity and potential disputes. Additionally, they should consider the significance of breaches and the reasonableness of their actions when seeking remedies or awards from the Tribunal.