Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Choose your role:
Boodram v. Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 843 - 2021 ONCAT 31 - 2021-04-15
Corporation:
BPSCC 843
Date:
2021-04-15
Summary:
the case of Boodram v Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No 843 went before the Condominium Authority Tribunal to determine whether or not a driver who parked in the visitor parking of a complex repeatedly, was a resident or a guest. The tribunal assessed the Respondent's evidence supporting their determination of the driver's residency and found that such evidence, while not conclusive, was reasonable. The tribunal also analyzed the Respondent's visitor parking policies and concluded that they should be classified as rules, which thus made them valid and enforceable. As the Applicant was unsuccessful in her dispute, the tribunal stated that there was no authorization for compensation or costs. The key takeaway from this case is that having clear criteria for residency or guest status in condominium declarations can be helpful in avoiding disputes, and that visitor parking policies for condominiums should be considered rules and subjected to proper procedures of approval and enforcement.
Under:
CAT Decisions - Decision
Compliance with Governing Documents
Fees, Costs, Penalties
Parking and Storage
Procedural Issue with Governing Documents
Reasonableness and/or Consistency of Governing Documents
Verdict:
the quick verdict is as follows:
The case, Boodram v Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No 843, involved a dispute over visitor parking and residency determination. The Respondent concluded that the driver was a resident and not permitted to use visitor parking, while the Applicant challenged this conclusion. The tribunal found that the Respondent's determination was reasonable based on the evidence presented and upheld their decision. The lesson from this case is that clear residency criteria and visitor parking policies should be established in condominium governing documents to avoid disputes and confusion. Additionally, solid evidence is crucial in supporting and defending decisions made in such disputes.
Takeaways:
Residency Criteria: The absence of clear residency criteria or definitions of guest/resident status in the governing documents of condominiums can lead to disputes and issues. In this case, the Respondent's determination of residency was challenged by the Applicant and found to be inconclusive.
Visitor Parking: Condominiums must carefully establish and enforce visitor parking policies to avoid confusion and disputes. This case characterizes visitor parking policies as valid and enforceable rules, in contrast to the Applicant's characterization of them as practices that lack proper approval.
Enforcement of Governing Documents: Courts and tribunals may favor the enforcement of condominium governing documents over individual disagreements regarding their interpretations. In this case, the Respondent's conclusion regarding the residency status of the driver was deemed reasonable, while the Applicant's challenges were rejected.
Evidence and Proof: The information provided in this case highlights the importance of solid evidence-based decision-making. Both parties submitted evidence regarding the residency of the driver of the Honda CRV, but only the Respondent's evidence was deemed sufficient to support its conclusion.
Cost Recovery: In cases before the Condominium Authority Tribunal, there is no authorization for compensation or costs, except in limited circumstances. In this case, the Applicant was not successful in her dispute and therefore was not awarded costs or compensation.
Recommendations:
Clarify Residency Criteria: It is essential for condominium corporations to clearly define residency criteria and guest/resident statuses in their governing documents. By establishing specific guidelines regarding the maximum number of visits before someone is considered a resident, the risk of disputes over parking and other issues can be minimized. This clarity will help ensure consistency in determining visitor parking eligibility.
Review and Update Visitor Parking Policies: Condominium corporations should review and update their visitor parking policies to ensure they are clear, enforceable, and aligned with the governing documents. This includes designating visitor parking spaces, clearly marking them, and outlining who is eligible to use them. Regularly communicating and educating residents about the visitor parking policies will help minimize confusion and potential disputes.
Strengthen Evidence-Based Decision Making: In cases where disputes arise regarding residency and visitor parking, it is crucial to rely on solid evidence to make fair and reasonable determinations. Condominium corporations should establish protocols for documenting visitor activities and parking violations to support their decisions. This may include maintaining accurate records, security logs, and employing surveillance tools if necessary. By strengthening evidence-based decision-making processes, the legitimacy of the corporation's determinations can be enhanced.