top of page
White Columns
< Back

2342941 Ontario Inc. v Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2329 - 2019 ONCAT 48 - 2019-12-05

Corporation:

2OITSCC 2329

Date:

2019-12-05

Summary:

In the case of 2342941 Ontario Inc. v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2329, the respondent sought to reopen a case where it was ordered to provide requested records to the applicant. The respondent claimed it was unaware of the case due to its management provider's failure to notify the board of proceedings. The applicant opposed the request to reopen, citing principles of fairness and efficiency. After reviewing the submissions, the Tribunal denied the respondent's motion to reopen the case, highlighting that the respondent had relied on its management provider and failed to take appropriate follow-up actions.

Under:

CAT Decisions - Motion Order

Verdict:

In the case of 2342941 Ontario Inc. v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2329, the motion to reopen the case was denied by the Tribunal. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2329 (TSCC 2329) claimed that their management provider's failure to notify them about the proceedings justified reopening, but the Tribunal found that TSCC 2329 had relied on their management provider and suggested that the applicant should have also been proactive. The Tribunal emphasized that there was no unfairness to TSCC 2329, and the confidentiality provisions of settlement agreements could be addressed between parties' counsel without reopening the case. Legal costs were not awarded to the applicant. The lesson is that parties should actively participate and communicate in legal proceedings, and reliance on third parties may not be a sufficient excuse for non-participation.




Takeaways:

In the case of 2342941 Ontario Inc. v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2329, the respondent, TSCC 2329, sought to reopen a case after a decision was made against them.

TSCC 2329 claimed that their management provider, Larlyn, had failed to notify the board of the proceedings, resulting in their non-participation.

The Tribunal considered whether it would be unfair to TSCC 2329 if the case were not reopened and whether reopening was justified under the Tribunal's rules.

The Tribunal denied TSCC 2329's motion to reopen, emphasizing that the respondent relied on its management provider for communication, but also suggested that the applicant should have questioned Larlyn's performance.

The decision highlighted that issues related to the exemption from disclosure and confidentiality of settlement agreements could be addressed professionally between the parties' counsel without reopening the case. Legal costs were not awarded to the applic

Recommendations: 

Proactive Communication: Parties involved in legal proceedings, such as condominium corporations, should maintain proactive communication with their legal representatives and any third-party service providers, like management companies. It is essential to ensure that all parties are aware of the proceedings and fulfill their respective roles to avoid potential issues arising from lack of communication.

Ownership of Responsibility: Parties should take ownership of their obligations in legal matters. While it's reasonable to rely on professionals such as management providers, there should be an understanding that ultimate responsibility lies with the party involved. In this case, the condominium corporation asserted that the unit owner should have questioned the management provider's performance, but the responsibility should also be acknowledged by the corporation itself.

Professional Dispute Resolution: Disputes or concerns related to confidentiality provisions of agreements should be addressed professionally between counsel. Rather than seeking to reopen a case, parties should engage in discussions and negotiations to resolve any concerns related to confidentiality and other issues that may arise during legal proceedings. Maintaining open lines of communication between legal representatives can help preserve ongoing relationships and facilitate more efficient dispute resolution.

Small and self-managed condominiums face unique challenges, yet most management models are tailored to large corporations and scaled down from there.

Condo Care helps communities find and implement management solutions that fit their actual needs... not someone else's template.

Psst... don't worry, we're different, too!

Condo Care

by Stratastic

A 10-unit condominium doesn't have 10% of the responsibilities of a 100-unit condominium.

​​

It still needs governance, compliance, maintenance planning, financial oversight, and community building. Yet many small condominium corporations receive less support because traditional management models are often designed for larger communities first.

​

Isn't it time condo management made sense, especially for the small ones?

We believe small condos deserve better.

Condo Care was created because we saw a quickly growing gap in the condominium industry.

 

Small condominium corporations were increasingly:

>   Struggling to find management.

>   Losing access to experienced professionals.

>   Being priced out of traditional models.

>   Left to solve complex challenges with limited resources.

 

Our mission is simple: To help small and self-managed condominium corporations access practical, sustainable management solutions that reflect their actual needs.

We're not property managers.
We're property management consultants.

Most companies start with a service package.

 

We start with your condominium. After understanding your goals, challenges, budget, and desired level of involvement, we help identify the most appropriate management model for your needs. We focus on you, so we can find the right fit for your community.

 

Because the right answer isn't always the same... 

and every condo needs care.

One Condominium. Multiple Paths Forward.

Condo Care offers completely customizable management solutions for small and self-managed condominium corporations across Ontario. Our most commonly chosen options center around the following categories:

 

>   Traditional Management: For boards seeking a comprehensive management solution with minimal involvement. Often, this involves working with one of our partnered property management companies for a more familiar approach.

 

>   Hybrid Management: A combination of licensed management services (whether through a management company or self-employed service provider) and/or administrative support. This solution is often ideal for smaller and moderately involved communities seeking flexibility and value.

 

>   Self-Management Support: For communities that want to stay truly involved while gaining access to professional guidance, resources, and trusted vendors.

What does an exploratory meeting look like?

Well, first of all, it's 100% free and 0% commitment... just a interest in putting our heads together to grasp your condominium's needs and how to support you shaping your condo community and operations!

​

Got 30 minutes? We've got a customized plan!

During your meeting, you'll get to discuss with our founder, Andreea, who is as passionate about small condo communities as you are about ensuring yours runs perfectly... both in terms of operations and communications!

​

You'll get to share what's working, what isn't, and how you envision your parcel of Condoland being managed, regardless if you're looking for self-management, limited management, or traditional property management solutions. 

​

We've got you covered. Because every condo deserves care.

While you're here and condo curious, why not check out our articles, tailored just for small condos!

Stay up to date 
with the constant
changing condo 
industry.

We invite you to join us! You'll fit right in to a community committed to simplifying condo.

Quick Links

Contact Us

1-888-788-1322
Monday - Friday, 10am - 4pm 

 

Stratastic Logo

Copyright ©2026 by Stratastic  | Privacy Policy 

bottom of page