top of page
White Columns
< Back


Mortazavi v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2048 et al. - 2023 ONCAT 126 - 2023-09-05

Corporation:

MTSCC 2048

Date:

2023-09-05

Under:

CAT Decisions - Dismissal Order
Noise

Summary:

In the case of Mortazavi v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2048 et al., the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) issued a Dismissal Order. The Applicant, had filed a case regarding a noise dispute. However, the applicant failed to actively participate in the proceedings, including not making any submissions or responding to notices. As a result, the CAT determined that the case had been abandoned and subsequently dismissed it.

Verdict:

This case demonstrates the importance of active participation and adherence to communication and submission deadlines in condominium dispute proceedings. Failure to engage with the process, make submissions, or respond to notices can result in the abandonment of the case. In this instance, the Applicant's lack of participation led to the dismissal of the case, emphasizing the need for active involvement in dispute resolution procedures to ensure a fair and complete hearing.

Takeaways:

Key Takeaways from "Mortazavi v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2048 et al., 2023 ONCAT 126":

Abandonment of Case: This case illustrates the authority of the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) to close a case in Stage 3 (Tribunal Decision) if the Applicant has abandoned their case. Abandonment can occur when the applicant fails to actively participate in the proceedings.

Importance of Communication: Effective communication within the CAT's Online Dispute Resolution system (ODR) is crucial for transparency and the completeness of the tribunal record. All parties are expected to use the ODR system to communicate, file documents, and make requests related to the case.

Adjournment Granted: In this case, an adjournment was granted upon the request of the Applicant's representative. However, despite the adjournment and provided instructions, the Applicant still did not submit any evidence or make submissions.

Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID): The tribunal issued a NOID as a final opportunity for the Applicant to participate in the case by submitting their submissions. The Applicant's failure to respond to the NOID led to the dismissal of the case.

Efficiency in Case Handling: This case highlights the importance of efficient case handling by the tribunal and the consequences of non-participation by the applicant, resulting in case dismissal. It underscores the need for active involvement in the dispute resolution process.

Recommendations: 

Ensure clarity in communication: It is recommended to ensure clear communication with all parties involved in the hearing. This is especially important in virtual hearings where parties may need technical help or additional guidance on using the online system. It is also important to ensure that all parties fully understand the expectations and requirements of the hearing process.

Be proactive in providing reminders and instructions: The tribunal provided several reminders and instructions to the parties. However, it may be helpful to be more proactive in reminding the parties of their deadlines and responsibilities during the hearing process. Providing regular updates on the status of the case, deadlines for filing submissions, and reminding parties about using the online system for communication can help ensure that all parties understand what is expected of them.

Consider consequences for failure to participate: In the event that one or more parties fail to actively participate in the hearing, it may be helpful for the tribunal to consider the consequences of such actions. In this case, the applicant failed to submit any materials or communicate with the tribunal after several reminders, leading to a dismissal of the case. Therefore, it is important to have policies and procedures in place to deal with parties who fail to actively participate in the hearing process.

bottom of page